{"id":2277,"date":"2002-05-17T23:49:20","date_gmt":"2002-05-18T03:49:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lia.bulaong.com\/wp\/?p=2277"},"modified":"2002-05-17T23:49:20","modified_gmt":"2002-05-18T03:49:20","slug":"pim_fortuyn_the_fascist_and_th","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lia.bulaong.com\/blog\/2002\/05\/pim_fortuyn_the_fascist_and_th\/","title":{"rendered":"pim fortuyn: “the fascist” and “the activist”"},"content":{"rendered":"

David Brooks’ “‘The Fascist’ and ‘The Activist'”<\/a> is a really interesting take on the politics of the late Pim Fortuyn and explains why, in the author’s view, the Western media has chosen to write about him simplistically.<\/p>\n

\n

In the parlors of polite society, social tolerance sits side by side with multiculturalism. They are two pastries on the platter of polite opinion. But Fortuyn was socially tolerant, even libertine, and it was for that reason he felt he could not be a multiculturalist.<\/p>\n

The Victorian gent does have a strategy when confronted with this clash of Good Opinions. Insulation. Retreat to the high-minded tolerance of your suburb and social circle, and leave it to other poor buggers to actually live with the intolerant extremists. That is to say, champion multiculturalism from the enlightened venue of leafy London or Cambridge, and force the bastards in Israel or the neighborhoods to actually confront the practical consequences of your ideas.<\/p>\n

But Fortuyn was a nationalist. The Victorian gent disapproves of nationalism, since it is a primitive passion, like excessive religious belief. But nationalism is actually a form of unselfishness, which takes one out of one’s immediate circle and induces one to love and care about one’s countrymen. In America, a nation of immigrants, nationalism takes one form. In France, the land of the blood and soil patrie, nationalism takes another form. In Holland, the land of pot bars, nationalism takes another form yet, Mr. Fortuyn’s.<\/p>\n

Fortuyn forcefully confronted the great contradiction in enlightened opinion. He argued that given the realities of the situation, one had to build a wall around one’s tolerance, and restrict the flow of people who refused to join the culture of openness. He proposed reducing immigration flows and stepping up assimilation programs.<\/p>\n

One can argue about the merits of his platform. One can argue whether Islam is really as intolerant as Fortuyn made it out to be or even whether this intolerance toward homosexuality and euthanasia is a good thing. But what is interesting from our point of view is that the Victorian gent that is the Western press corps could not even allow Pim Fortuyn to exist.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

I have to admit I never thought of what Brooks posits until reading this and now that I have it does make some sense, and so putting him in the company of France’s Le Pen or Austria’s Haider seems inaccurate, not to mention somewhat unfair. I can’t say I agree with Fortuyn’s politics still but it’s good to have an idea of the thought behind them.
\n[ via Gulfstream<\/a> ]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

David Brooks’ “‘The Fascist’ and ‘The Activist’” is a really interesting take on the politics of the late Pim Fortuyn and explains why, in the<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2277","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cheesedip"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lia.bulaong.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2277","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lia.bulaong.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lia.bulaong.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lia.bulaong.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lia.bulaong.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2277"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lia.bulaong.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2277\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lia.bulaong.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2277"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lia.bulaong.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2277"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lia.bulaong.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2277"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}